skip to Main Content
Call Us Today! 269-459-1484

Mehmet Hassan Killers Convicted, Shocking Video Tells the Tale

Mehmet <span id="more-1647"></span>Hassan Killers Convicted, Shocking Video Tells the Tale

Mehmet Hassan had no idea that Leonie Granger, entering the casino with him here as seen on surveillance video, would be their death trap.

Three people were found responsible of killing Mehmet Hassan, a expert gambler who had been killed in their London home back in March 2014.

The murder occurred after Hassan was lured in by a woman he knew as ‘Rachel,’ who then permitted two other guys use of their flat, where he was killed.

But ‘Rachel’ was Leonie that is actually 25-year-old Granger who came across Hassan in a Mayfair casino shortly before his murder.

On the night associated with the killing, Hassan took Granger towards the Palm Beach Casino and gave her money to gamble with. Then they traveled back to Hassan’s Islington flat.

Granger Set Robbery Plot in Motion

But Hassan was unaware that Granger ended up being actually using her boyfriend, Kyrron Jackson, and his friend, Nicholas Chandler, to create a plot up. She made yes that the duo gained use of the flat before she left.

The two men then tied up Hassan before brutally kicking him to death. Chances are they tore through his home looking for the funds they considered to be stashed into the apartment, as he had been known to keep cash in his home, instead of depositing it in to a bank account.

Eventually, the cash was found by them. a video clip on Granger’s mobile phone revealed the three defendants having fun with numerous 50 that is&pound$74) bills, stuffing them into their pants and throwing them around an area, as well as one pretending to relieve himself on bills spread across the floor of the flat.

Prosecutors say the video was made after Hassan’s death, while the defense claimed it was actually made four months earlier and was unrelated to the case.

But jurors were convinced that the three defendants were accountable for Hassan’s death, and all three were found guilty. Jackson and Chandler were convicted of murder, while Granger was found bad regarding the reduced charge of manslaughter for her role into the crime.

Whenever verdicts were delivered, Chandler began to swear and lash out within the courtroom, forcing security officers to remove him from the court. Granger admitted to being part of an idea to rob Hassan, but stated she had no direct role in the murder, which may have led to her lesser conviction.

Jackson, Chandler Had History of Violent Criminal Activity

This was not the first time that Jackson and Chandler was in fact included in violent crimes. In January and February of 2014, the set was indeed involved with two robberies that are armed A south Kensington casino. In every one of those instances, victims were tied up and the males carried firearms during the robberies.

Mehmet Hassan took Granger, who offered under a name that is different to gamble on his dime at London’s Palm Beach Casino Club. (Image: PA)

Hassan was a member that is revered of London live casino gambling scene, and was thought to regularly play poker at the Palm Beach Casino Club.

‘He was a wonderful hot man…and he would gamble on any such thing,’ Hendon Mob founder Ross Boatman told the London Evening Standard after his death. ‘He loved to gamble and, win or lose, it never affected him. He was constantly smiling, constantly upbeat.’

Jackson and Chandler were also convicted on fees of robbery, conspiracy to falsely imprison, as well as other charges. After the verdicts were read, Judge William Kennedy told the defendants that he expected them to face severe punishments for their crimes.

‘You will return right here for sentence on 28 April,’ Kennedy said tuesday. ‘I think you face very significant [time] and immediate custody.’

IOC Adopts Sports Betting Integrity Proposals

The IOC will implement new recommendations to help combat corruption and match-fixing. (Image: IOC)

The Overseas Olympic Committee (IOC) has determined to adopt several new proposals to guard the integrity of Olympic sporting events following the first ever meeting of this International Forum for Sports Integrity (IFSI) in Lausanne on Monday.

This new initiatives will take care of many different aspects of the sports world, including several that are dedicated to the sports gambling industry.

Often, industry groups resist increased scrutiny and oversight, but that doesn’t seem to be issue in this case.

Most regulated sports betting operations are in favor of protecting the integrity of games by any means feasible, as it protects their businesses as much as it helps the IOC, other recreations organizations, players and fans.

For instance, the European Sports Security Association (ESSA) has stated before it starts that they will be happy to work with the IOC to help stop match fixing.

‘We are pleased we could be part of this initiative,’ ESSA Chairman Mike O’Kane stated. ‘These measures are a important milestone in the drive by sporting bodies as well as the regulated betting industry to keep sport clean and protect consumers, regulated betting operators and athletes from unscrupulous activities.’

Hotline allowing for Anonymous Tips

One of the major initiatives from the IOC will be a whistleblower hotline that will allow individuals to report possible match-fixing or other corruption to the IOC.

The hotline, which depends online, will offer you complete anonymity to anyone who wants to use it, from users of the public to athletes, coaches or referees.

At the IFSI, governments worldwide were also strongly encouraged to sign to the Council of European countries’s convention against match-fixing, which means that regional and nationwide laws allow for cooperation with criminal investigations into match-fixing operations and properly punish practices that threaten the integrity of sporting competitions.

‘When it comes to the battle against manipulation and associated corruption, sport requires the help and cooperation of governments and authorities that are governmental other stakeholders much a lot more than in virtually any other area,’ said IOC President Thomas Bach.

The IOC isn’t taking all of the responsibility for preventing match-fixing issues in sports worldwide, however. The organization says that FIFA and (in Europe) UEFA should remain the organizations that are go-to whistleblowers who wish to combat match-fixing in soccer.

And when it comes down to show drugs that are enhancing people with information should contact national organizations of the World Anti-Doping Agency.

No ‘Test’ for Match-Fixing

According to Bach, the new hotline is necessary because it is much more difficult to detect when a contest could be fixed in comparison with sniffing out cheaters who’re taking illegal substances.

‘you cannot detect corruption and match-fixing by taking a blood test,’ Bach stated. ‘we need the assistance and help of governments and police authorities who possess far more power and a lot more information and more possibilities than sport can have.’

O’Kane agreed with that assessment, saying that education, partnerships and the effective exchange of information is central to how both the ESSA and the IOC want to protect the integrity of activities.

‘Credit should go to the IOC for continuing to include all responsible stakeholders in its integrity discussions once the best and way that is only be effective in this area,’ O’Kane stated. ‘As responsible, regulated betting operators we want to share data on match-fixing and all sorts of countries should ratify the Council of Europe Convention, which enables operators to share with you confidential data in a protected environment with established national platforms.’

California Internet Poker Committee Hearings Due Before End of April

California will hold hearings on the poker that is online this month, it is there any hope for regulation unless Pechanga has an alteration of heart? (Image:

California is likely to get Senate that is joint and on line poker committee hearings before May 1, which is the due date for policy committees to hear fiscal bills.

That means hearings are most likely that occurs later on this month, assisted along by the very fact that sponsors of the latest two ‘shell’ bills, Senator Isadore Hall and Assemblyman Adam Gray, are seats of Senate and Assembly Government Organization committees.

‘Nothing was finalized or approved, however the chairs of each committee are looking at keeping a few joint informational hearings on the issue so all the new users of each committee have better knowledge of the complexities of Internet gambling,’ Senate GO Committee Director Art Terzakis said this week.

Terzakis ended up being unable to say exactly what the agenda for the hearing would look like and who does be testifying, explaining ‘it’s too early for that.’

In reality, he believes the first hearing may be ‘just an overview of gambling in California.’

Insufficient Consensus

Not surprisingly small change in the right direction, the passing of an internet poker bill in 2015 stays an unlikely prospect; a recent report by Morgan Stanley said it foresaw no states opting to regulate in 2015, although it thought that California, along with Pennsylvania, ny and Illinois, would do so within the ‘next few years.’

At the center of the issue in California could be the intransigence of the various stakeholders that are different the language of the bills. Along side Hall and Gray’s shell bills, which presently contain no language to speak of, two other bills have been introduced this session that is legislative.

Assemblyman Mike Gatto’s AB9 would permit only operators that are tribal card rooms to apply for online poker licenses, while Assemblyman Reginald Jones-Sawyer’s AB167 would include the state’s racetracks.

Gatto’s bill, meanwhile, includes strict bad star language which may bar an operator like PokerStars from entering the market, while the Jones-Sawyer bill is much softer in its bad actor stance compared to bill he presented this past year, and appears to leave the door ajar for PokerStars.

Broadly, the stakeholders are divided in to two camps: the Pechanga tribal coalition, that is against bad actors and the racetracks, and the Morongo tribal coalition, which is available to both.

Pechanga Might Derail Process

Pechanga has suggested so it may be willing to reach a compromise in the PokerStars concern, if the tribes are able to cooperate together in the market with the internet poker giant, however it remains steadfast on its position towards the racetracks.

While this might be considered progress, at the least in one direction, the problem of the racetracks remains a big sticking point. Because the legalization of online poker would affect tax policy in California, it would need a two-thirds bulk to be passed by the legislature, which probably means that it would want agreement from all parties.

The racing that is pari-mutual, meanwhile, has said it might oppose legislation that excluded it and Governor Jerry Brown has said he would not sign such legislation into law. This year unless Pechanga changes its mind, then, online poker will not be legalized in California.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *